Ken Cuccinelli, the Republican candidate for attorney general in Virginia, is a religious conservative with a special loathing for LGBT Americans. If elected, he will be the commonwealth's premier crime fighter, a position of trust that should be awarded to a person who's prepared to protect all citizens, not just those he finds morally acceptable. Joe Sudbay writes: Ken Cuccinelli wants to be the top law enforcement official in Virginia. Apparently, he's unaware of the Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas. Or, worse yet, Cuccinelli thinks his version of "natural law" trumps the U.S. Supreme Court. You can't get much more theocratic than that.
Cuccinelli flouts his anti-gay street creds: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They’re intrinsically wrong." (Love the sinner hate the sin. This is the Halloween mask of Bigotry.) "And I think in a natural law based country it’s appropriate to have policies that reflect that. They don’t comport with natural law." (I suppose the many animal species that engage in same-sex relationships and pair bonding don't fall under Cuccinelli's definition of "natural law.") "I happen to think that it represents - to put it politely; I need my thesaurus to be polite - behavior that is not healthy to an individual and in aggregate is not healthy to society."
From the Washington Post: Putting aside what Mr. Cuccinelli has to say about homosexuals when he's not trying so hard to be polite, let's call his comments what they are: bigotry. Appeals to "natural law" and "intrinsic" rights and wrongs were the usual clichés deployed to justify the old-time religion of hatred then directed at African Americans, Jews, Italians, Irish and other immigrants. It is especially alarming that this ugly nonsense is coming from Mr. Cuccinelli, who, if he becomes the attorney general of Virginia - a job that combines aspects of chief government lawyer and top cop - would be in a position to act on it.
The Virginia-Pilot has just endorsed Ken Cuccinelli's opponent, Democrat Steve Shannon, for attorney general. In an editorial published this week, the paper listed several reasons why Cuccinelli is such a poor choice for the state: As a Republican state senator, his limited-government philosophy led him to oppose common-sense safety measures and some crime bills... (He) even argued against stricter laws for cockfighting... Cuccinelli’s views on reproductive rights don’t align with those of most Virginians. He favors legislation that would grant legal rights to fetuses at conception. He has sponsored bills requiring strict regulations that would put most abortion clinics out of business. He voted against a bill stating that contraception is not abortion. (Taking the pill = killing babies. No wonder the wingnuts love him.) To put it politely, Cuccinelli’s election would bring embarrassment to Virginia, instability to the state’s law firm and untold harm to the long list of people who don’t fit his personal definition of morality.
If Cuccinelli beats Shannon at the polls, district attorneys in Virginia will be taking their lead from a man who views the LGBT community as evildoers and women's reproductive rights as nonexistent. It will be a dark day in Old Dominion.