« The Young Voters Came Through This Time | Main | A Moratorium on Sarah Palin... [evil grin] or not? »

November 19, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e552e19fa38833010536035b23970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Huckabee: Gays Don't Have to Worry About Violence:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I saw that segment on the View and it looked to me like they were all handling him with kid gloves - even Whoopi. No one took issue over what Huckabee said about the guy getting his head cracked open, insinuating that stuff like never happens to gay men. It felt like Whoopi was going to call him on it... but then Huck launched into his story about a Christian woman being attacked somehere, and that ended that. So disappointing.

I'm a huge supporter of gay right, but I think this article is unfair to huckabee. It puts his face next to pictures of acts that he would probably not condone. The man may not support marriage or adoption for gay couples, but I fail to see how that makes him a supporter of violence. If he does condone violence then this article did a very poor job of providing proof.

It's fine to be against someone because of what they believe, but don't skew the truth even for a noble cause.

Nobody said that Huckabee condoned violence against LGBT people, although he sure hasn't helped things by voting AGAINST hate crimes legislation. Huck said the DIFFERENCE between gay rights and civil rights was the violence that blacks had to put up with. Those photos show that gays have also been assaulted in their struggle for equality.

huckleberry doesn't get it - he prolly doesn't know any gays, much less gays who had the crap beaten out of them

conservatives need to get down on my nuts

F*** YOU mike

You kids have to remember that Huck thinks that if he accepts gays then he will burn in hell. Your not going to change his beliefs, he is a biggot (as so is his god). This is just an example of the "Jerry Springer" thought process, get a bunch of ignorant people with extreme differences and watch the violence. That whole The View show was setup for conflict and ratings. Simple as that. You can't change a belief based on irrational fear and you can't change Huck's views. The View is at fault here, not Huck... too bad ol' Huck is a x'ian, gays and jesus just don't work together. too bad cause there is a reason jesus never got married and hung out with a bunch of men...it was the perfect trick (jesus=gay man). :-)

He's another typical right wing Christian Nutjob: a fake, insincere, smiling, 'hate the sin, love the sinner' bullshit artist. I loathe everything people like this stand for. Too many people have taken too much crap from the gay haters/bashers for too long to let them get away with this shit any longer! Stand up for your rights. Fight back.

Rise up against the hate.

Sorry, "Pastor Dave," but please don't call my God a bigot. More than that, it is just pointless to insinuate that Jesus was a gay man. God is not a bigot, some of his followers are. Some of his followers are willing to ignore the message of Christianity so they may remain comfortable in ignorance and hatred, but they in no way speak for my religion.
So what's the deal with you calling Jesus gay? Is it to create your own hatred--because you think Christian will say "OH MY GOSH YOU HEATHEN"? Sorry to disappoint. What really worries me is that you are spreading the bigotry to are pretending to decry.
PS- Gays and Jesus? Total BFFs.

Dear Christian,

It's comments like yours that make my humble blogging efforts worthwhile. Thanks for responding. Regards, Max

Just to play devils advocate here, last time I checked gays are victims of hate crimes, not victims of government abuse. Being attacked by random idiots is not the same as having the police cracking your skull for marching in Selma.

I don't like him either. But, the heart of Huckabee's argument is the fact that the fundamental meaning of the term "marriage" is in danger of being changed. If you think twisting a word's meaning is no biggie, you need to think more about the long term implications of how the past is perceived (and the future shaped) based on differing definitions of the same word. What good is our language if meaning changes from writing to reading?
Whether you're a believer in the Biblical God or not, you should at least respect that "marriage" was defined there as a union between a man and a woman. Homosexuals should stop trying to use it to describe their proposed unions. Come up with your own term. Is that so difficult?
Despite how the media portrays the opinions of the "Christian right," I think most of us really don't care to control what gays do behind closed doors, or if they have an institution legally equal to marriage. Surely, there's still enough creativity in English speaking people to generate a new word every now and then...isn't there?

Actually, Dave, that's not true. Gays and transgendered people are frequently the victims of police brutality. Look it up with Amnesty International. They have quite a bit of information.
Either way, the definition of a "civil rights movement" includes no violence qualifications.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Welcome to ProPup!


THANKS FOR VISITING!


Places of Interest

OUR HONORARY PUPS:


Blog powered by TypePad